But i have muted this guy as i was getting very angry… Even when you the moderator told him to stop he kept going, and i am not going to get into any fights, so i made it simple… i have put him on ignore list permanently and will never ever read any of his posts… ever… so don’t worry, there will be no fighting from me. How this is bashing in any way shape or form, i have no idea. I have no idea why this guy has an issue with me…Īll i am saying is, since Logic/s1/reaper can do it at 32 and 64 samples, the fact cubase can not, means it’s up to Steinberg to fix low latency performance. The way I get around it now, is use the apollo for all my monitoring, using UAD dsp effects, and setting Cubase at 128 to play for when I use VSTi’s…įor me, playing piano and drums, 128 is too high… Especially when i use analog hardware synths which are basically instant. If this guy thinks I am a liar, I am happy to take video to show the difference, the way Logic spreads the load and how there are zero dropouts at 32 samples at ALL… even when i use my midi keyboard to play realtime very hungry synths like Diva… (cubase needs 128 for Diva). But even as such, on the exact same computers using the exact same interfaces, the other DAWs i mentioned CAN do what Cubase can not. This is all I am saying…Įven though my macs are not the latest, my macbook pro is not far behind the current very top of the line one… but i admit, my imac is basically a 2600K inside, old processor. With logic, Reaper, S1… I can monitor all 32 audio inputs, in realtime, at 32 samples, and each with a reverb plugin on them! I mean the difference is huge. If i wanted to bypass the apollo mixer and use native plugins instead, i.e, use Cubase monitoring 32 channels of audio going into it in realtime, through native FX, Cubase is very problematic at 32 samples.Same with pro tools. With Cubase, sometimes 64 works.īut it’s not just VI’s… I record 32 audio tracks at a time right, i have 2 apollo 8’s with adat filled on both, so 32 inputs each all recording hardware midi… Pro tools HAS to be at 128…īUT… Logic, Reaper, and Studio 1, can all play the exact same VI’s with exact same settings, at 32 samples. On both the macs in my signature, not state of the art macs by any means, whether using internal audio or UAD apollo (i have also tried my MOTU ultralite on the imac as that has FW800 port), Cubase when set to 32 or 64 samples can not play Vi’s… Pro tools can NOT do it at 32 samples either, ok. Ok… I will try to explain it more simply… I have no idea why he is doing this, but thanks for interjecting. There’s no reason to assume that he’s posting this in bad faith. ← Audio Engineering vs.Posting your opinion is fine, but the way you’re expressing it is only going to start a fight.And if you're still struggling, try both DAWs and see which one suits you best. We hope that this comparison has helped you make an informed decision. However, if MIDI and virtual instruments are more important in your workflow, Logic Pro X should be your go-to DAW. If you're mainly working with audio editing, Pro Tools is the better choice. Ultimately, choosing between Pro Tools and Logic Pro X is dependent on your needs as an audio professional. However, when it comes to one-time purchase, Logic Pro X is significantly cheaper than Pro Tools. Priceīoth Pro Tools and Logic Pro X offer a subscription-based pricing model. However, Logic Pro X has an advantage offering some exclusive plugins and instruments only found in Apple's DAW. Plugins and Virtual Instrumentsīoth DAWs offer a vast array of plugins and virtual instruments. Pro Tools has MIDI editing capabilities, but not as comprehensive as Logic Pro X. If your project involves MIDI, Logic Pro X is the better choice as it offers more MIDI features, including a built-in MIDI environment. Logic Pro X also has impressive audio editing features, but not as extensive as Pro Tools. It offers advanced tools for audio editing, making it the preferred choice for professional sound editors. Pro Tools is renowned for its editing capabilities. Both DAWs offer a dark mode, which is a great option for those long studio sessions. Logic Pro X's interface is more visually pleasing and customizable. Pro Tools has a clean and straightforward interface, making it easy to navigate. Logic Pro X: Which One Should You Pick?Īre you an audio professional trying to choose between Pro Tools and Logic Pro X? Look no further! We've conducted an unbiased comparison to help you make the best choice for your needs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |